Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Finnegan
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided November 21, 1949No. 6123PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
87 F.Supp. 274 (1949)
MORGAN
v.
FINNEGAN.
No. 6123.
United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.
November 21, 1949.
Karol A. Korngold, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
Theron Lamar Caudle, Assistant Attorney General, Andrew D. Sharpe and Elizabeth B. Davis, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, Drake Watson, United States Attorney, of New London, Mo., and William V. O'Donnell, Assistant United States Attorney, of St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
HULEN, District Judge.
Is income from property owned by husband and wife in an estate by the entirety subject to yearly appropriation by the wife, or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Otto F. Stifel's Union Brewing Co. v. SaxySupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Greene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Grose v. HollandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. HartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Morgan v. Finnegan, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Hutcherson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950
- In Re PorterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
- Bernstein v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1952
- Finney v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.