Legal Opinion
Banzeruk v. Estate of Howitz Ex Rel. Moody
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 22, 2006No. 56059-0-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
135 P.3d 512 (2006)
132 Wash.App. 942
Olga BANZERUK, Appellant,
v.
ESTATE OF Allan HOWITZ, through its personal representative, Heather MOODY, Respondent.
No. 56059-0-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
May 22, 2006.
F. Lawrence Taylor, Jr., Taylor Law Firm PS, Renton, WA, for Appellant.
Robert Alex Mannheimer, Robert A. Mannheimer, PS, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
BECKER, J.
¶ 1 For the purpose of tolling any statute of limitations, the filing of the complaint tentatively commences the action, and the plaintiff has an additional 90 days after filing within which to serve the defendant. This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Kramer v. J.I. Case Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Parkland Light & Water Co. v. Tacoma-Pierce County Board of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Parkland Light & Water Co. v. Tacoma-Pierce County Board of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Banzeruk v. Estate of HowitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. MORAN, WINDES & WONG, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Smith v. Moran, Windes & Wong, PLLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Ivonne Campbell v. Ana FernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Daryl Pecelj Et Ano, V. Derek SparksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024
- Heidi Diep v. Myurie J. AuslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.