Legal Opinion
Gettysburg School District 53-1 v. Helms and Associates
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 2008No. 24543PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Bituminous Paving, Inc. (Bituminous) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the Gettysburg School District (District) for faulty construction of an outdoor track. We affirm.
[¶ 2.] The District entered into a contract with Bituminous for the construction of an outdoor track and with Helms and Associates (Helms) for engineering services of designing and inspecting the construction of the track. Bituminous’ contract with the District required Bituminous to remove the old track, prepare the base of the new track, and lay the asphalt running surface. Bituminous appeared…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Miller v. HernandezSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Baker v. JewellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. VenturaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Casper Lodging, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Kurtz v. SquiresSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Reede Construction, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.