Legal Opinion
Ballard Medical Products v. H. Earl Wright, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 9, 1987No. 87-1038, 87-1064PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
H. Earl Wright (Wright) has moved for dismissal of this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
On March 31, 1984, Wright and Ballard Medical Products (Ballard) entered a license agreement in which Ballard was granted the exclusive right to produce health-care products using certain foam devices claimed in Wright’s U.S. Patent Nos. 3,428,222, 3,709,437, 3,937,364, 3,973,701, 3,985,271, 4,018,364, 4,022,351, 4,044,923, and 4,184,615 and in application serial Nos. 330,254 and 352,936. On December 24, 1985, Ballard sued Wright, Earl Wright Co. (EWC), and ICI…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Atari, Inc. v. Js & a Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Charles R. Christianson and International Trade Services, Inc., Etc. v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Shiley, Inc. v. Bentley Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
3Cited by31 opinions
- Prize Frize, Inc. v. Matrix (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Additive Controls & Measurement Systems, Inc. v. Flowdata, Inc. And Titan Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Prize Frize, Inc. v. MatrixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Speedco, Incorporated v. Donald EstesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.