Additive Controls & Measurement Systems, Inc. v. Flowdata, Inc. And Titan Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas refused to remand Additive Controls & Measurement Systems, Inc.’s (Adcon) business disparagement case to state court. Instead the district court enjoined Adcon from infringing Flowdata, Inc.’s patent. Additive Controls & Measurement Sys., Inc. v. Flowdata, Inc., No. H-90-1554, 1991 WL 345967 (S.D.Tex. Nov. 5, 1991). Because Adcon’s suit requires resolution of a substantial question of patent law, the district court possessed subject matter jurisdiction and properly denied the motion to remand. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Oakley, Inc. v. Sunglass Hut International, Lenscrafters, Inc., Ray Ban Sun Optics, Luxottica Group S.P.A., and Leonardo Del VecchioCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Linear Technology Corp. v. Applied Materials, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Aspex Eyewear, Inc. v. Marchon Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Hunter Douglas, Inc. v. Harmonic Design, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.