Acosta v. State

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

This escape case was first considered by this Court on September 16, 1982. We reversed because we found that proof of enhancement allegations was insufficient. 654 S.W.2d 12. The Court of Criminal Appeals disagreed, Acosta v. State, 650 S.W.2d 827 (Tex.Cr.App.1983) and remanded the case for our consideration of the remaining grounds of error. We affirm.

In his second ground of error, the appellant complains that the trial court committed error by arraigning him one day after he was served with a copy of the indictment. The applicable statute requires a two-day interval…