Legal Opinion

People v. Rolf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon review of the record, we reject defendant’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel. Viewed in totality, the representation provided to defendant met the standard of "meaningful representation” (People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). The defense was that the victim’s death was accidental; thus, counsel’s failure to offer psychiatric testimony to support the defense of extreme emotional disturbance must be regarded as a deliberate tactical decision.

The court properly admitted evidence of defendant’s prior threats and acts…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. HollowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. DilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. People v. KovacsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. People v. NoriegaNew York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API