Legal Opinion
Steenholdt v. Federal Aviation Administration
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 10, 2003No. 01-1331PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.
SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Randy Steenholdt challenges the decision of the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) not to renew his authority to examine certain aircraft repairs for compliance with the FAA’s airworthiness regulations. Because the decision is “committed to agency discretion by law,” 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2) (1996), we have no jurisdiction to review the substance of the FAA’s decision. Petitioner also argues that the Administration failed to follow its own procedures. Insofar as there was any such failure, it was without…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ashley Hunt Greenwood v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Safe Extensions, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Damus v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Jill Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.