Legal Opinion
State v. Pacheco
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 17, 1969PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division, 106 N. J. Super. 540.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weirtraub and Justices Jacobs, Erakcis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Hake-mar — 7.
For reversal — None.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MolnarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State v. PughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- State v. MolnarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. BARTHOLOMEW P. MCINERNEY(08-10-2334, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.