Legal Opinion

Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 17, 1969PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons

expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 104 N. J. Super. 403. No Costs.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Weuttraub and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.

For reversal — Hone.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. State v. PachecoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Lepic Ex Rel. Lepic v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  3. Wolfe v. State Farm Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. In Re Arbitration Between Mary & William HarrisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. Taddei v. State Farm Indem. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API