Forbes v. Forbes
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Defendant and cross-complainant Beulah Forbes was granted an interlocutory decree of divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. She has appealed from certain portions of the decree only insofar as they settled some of the property rights of the parties. For convenience of statement the respective parties will be referred to hereafter as the husband and the wife.
The husband has legal title to an apartment house referred to in the briefs as the Scott Street property. This was acquired by the husband prior to the marriage of the parties and the purchase price was partly paid by him before…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Travelers Insurance v. FancherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Vieux v. VieuxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Caswell v. CaswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Modern Woodmen of America v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Marriage of Cain v. CainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Tibbetts v. TibbettsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.