State v. Wood

HENRIOD, Chief Justice.

Appeal from burglary and grand larceny convictions. Remanded with instructions to consider and act on pending motions for new trial.

At the time appeals were taken there were two motions for new trial pending. The appeals, therefore, were premature, and there was no indication in the record reflecting any waiver of rights thereunder.1

Defendants urge error in submission of verdicts, that the verdicts were contrary to the evidence and the presumption of innocence, and that the court and prosecutor prejudicially abused defendants’ rights by their conduct. The record does…