Cobb v. French
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Ramsey county to restrain defendant from attempting to enforce chapter 428, p. 516, Laws 1909, as against plaintiff. Defendant demurred to the complaint on- the ground that the same did not state a cause of action. From an order, Hallam, J., overruling the demurrer, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
Chapter 428, p. 516, Laws 1909 (R. L. Supp. 1909, § 1743), provides that all milk and cream received or purchased for the purpose of manufacturing the same into butter or cheese shall be received or purchased by weight, and payment therefor to be upon the basis of the butter fat contained, the amount of which shall be ascertained 'by what is known as the “Babcock test,” made by the use of a mechanical apparatus. Chapter 498, p. 623, Laws 1909, is entitled “An act providing for the licensing of operators of testing apparatus and prescribing a penalty for it's violation.” Section 1 reads:…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Barron v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Nelson v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Basting v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Milton Dairy Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.