Legal Opinion

R. R. Dancy & Co. v. Rosenberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1915No. 6759PublishedCited by 15 opinions

•Ajipeal from District Court, Harris County; William Mastersou, Judge. Action by G. A. Rosenberg against R. R. Dancy, Sr., and R. R. Dancy, Jr., copartners doing business as R. R. Dancy & Co. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIiANE, J.

This suit was instituted by ap-pellee, G. A. Rosenberg against R. R. Dancy, Sr., and R. R. Dancy, Jr., composing the firm of R. R. Dancy & Co., to recover the reasonable value of services alleged to have been performed by said Rosenberg for appellants, Dancy & Co., of the alleged aggregate value of $988.50 and for 6 per cent, interest per annum thereon from September 27,1913. Ap-pellee’s petition was verified as required by article 1902, Acts 83d Leg. 1913, pp. 256, 257 (Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914, art. 1902). Appellants were served with citation in manner and for the length of time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scottish Union Insurance v. Tomkies & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Gillaspie v. City of HuntsvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Western Lumber Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Paggi v. Rose Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. San Antonio Paper Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Gulf, T. & W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Borger v. Mineral Wells Clay Products Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API