Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Ulman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1980No. [Misc. No. 9, September Term, 1979.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEldridge, J.

The United States District Court for the District of Maryland has certified two questions of Maryland law for our consideration pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, Maryland Code (1974, 1980 Repl. Vol.), § 12-601 et seq. of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. The questions are:

"1. (a) Does a new and separate cause of action accrue against the publisher of a libelous statement each time a third party republishes the libelous statement under circumstances in which the republication can be said to be the natural and probable consequence of the original…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Harig v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Kelley v. RinkleTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hahn v. ClaybrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  5. Mumford v. Staton, Whaley & PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Clare R. Bruffett v. Warner Communications, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Staheli v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Adler v. American Standard Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API