Legal Opinion
Haas v. Speenburgh
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStaley, J.
Upon the pleadings and the report of the referee filed herein, the plaintiff applies for confirmation of the referee’s report and for an interlocutory judgment of partition and sale.
Daniel Gan died in 1902, without descendants, leaving a will which was duly probated in Greene county. His property consisted in part of a farm which is the subject of this action. At the time of his death he left him surviving Eliza E. Gan, his widow, Isaac Gan, a brother, and Adaline Van Valkenburgh Lloyd, a sister, and nephews and nieces, the children of two deceased sisters.
His will so far as material…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Tillman v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Swasey v. Jaques.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Central Trust Co. v. . EglestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Keniston v. MayhewMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BarryNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- In Re the Accounting of the Equitable Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Estate of Robison v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of BurnettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
- Schantz v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A. (In Re Schantz)District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.