Legal Opinion

Brantley v. Curtis Automatic Transmission Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 21, 1966No. 170205PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarvey, P.J.

In this action of contract there was a finding for the plaintiff on a declaration alleging the defendant improperly rebuilt an automatic transmission in his motor vehicle. The report states :

“At the close of the trial and before the final arguments, the plaintiff made certain requests for rulings. The court granted all of plaintiff’s requests for rulings and found for the plaintiff. The defendant duly filed a timely request for report and a draft report. The plaintiff filed a motion for judgment ‘for the reason’ in the language of said motion, ‘that the defendant’s request for report filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leshefsky v. American EmPloyers' InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Barton v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Muir Brothers Co. v. Sawyer Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. Bangs v. FarrMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Nutter v. MroczkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. C. & P. Homes, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1970
  2. Ed Herrington, Inc. v. ClarkMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985
  3. Maxwell v. Norwood Marine, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API