Legal Opinion
Bangs v. Farr
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 21, 1911PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.
These are two actions, by which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for breaches of a written contract. The plaintiff was the exclusive agent of the manufacturer for the sale of certain automobiles in New England, and was authorized to establish sub-agencies. He made a contract with the defendant, which was in terms an agreement by the plaintiff to sell to the defendant automobiles at a discount of ten per cent from the list prices, and by which among other matters the defendant agreed to devote his entire time between January 1 and September 30, 1906, to selling these automobiles and to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sayles v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Clarke v. Second National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Todd v. KeeneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
- Wylie v. CotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Jaquith v. DavenportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Bianchi v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Snyder v. RosenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Manchester Supply Co. v. AppellMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1990
- Maxwell v. Norwood Marine, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.