Legal Opinion

Iannarelli v. Kansas City Life Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1933No. 7549PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, President :

Plaintiff, as committee, prevailed in the trial court in seeking to have a life insurance policy declared to be in full force and effect, the insured restored to all rights and benefits thereunder, and to require the defendant to keep the policy in force without further payment of premiums during insured’s disability. An appeal was awarded the defendant.

The defendant cancelled the policy because the second annual premium had not been paid within the period of grace provided for in the policy. Insured was adjudged insane before the second annual premium became due and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Pfeiffer v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Adkins v. Aetna Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Polan v. Travelers Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Green v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Sherman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API