Legal Opinion

Kono Mfg. Co. v. Vogue Optical Mfg. Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 15, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

This action is for an injunction and damages for infringement of plaintiff’s Design Patent No. 146,224 relating to a spectacle frame.

The plaintiff is a co-partnership composed of Alexander Kono, Blanche Kono and Florence Smith and is a manufacturer of spectacle frames. On May 1, 1946 Alexander Kono filed an application with the Commissioner of Patents for the grant of Design Letters Patent upon the spectacle frame design which is the subject of this suit. Prior to issuance of the Design Patent, the rights to the design were transferred to the plaintiff. Some…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Harries v. Air King Products Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. General Time Instruments Corp. v. United States Time Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  4. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc. v. Carole Bags, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  5. Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API