Legal Opinion
SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 3, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-165. No. 96-10-02398PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WALLACH, Judge.
I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff SKW Stickstoffwerke Piesteritz GmbH (“SKWP”) challenges the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) decision in Solid Urea From the German Democratic Republic: Termination of Changed Circumstances Review, 61 Fed.Reg. 49436 (September 20, 1996) (“Termination”). SKWP claims that Commerce acted contrary to law when it terminated the Changed Circumstances Review as a result of the initiation of an Administrative Review. According to SKWP, once the Changed Circumstances Review was commenced, Commerce was obligated by statute and its own…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SloanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Canadian Fur Trappers Corp., and Meldisco, a Division of Melville Corp. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- GMN Georg Muller Nurnberg AG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marine Harvest (Chile) S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002