Legal Opinion
H. Davis v. Lifetime Capital, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 18, 2014No. 11-4442UnpublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, District Judge:
Intervenor-Appellant, Natlis Capital, LLC (Natlis), appeals from an order denying its motion to intervene under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) and (b)(1). Natlis seeks to intervene in H. Thane Davis’s suit against Lifetime Capital, Inc. (Lifetime). In the underlying action, Davis alleged fraud and breach of contract against Lifetime. 1 At Davis’s request the court appointed a receiver, Thomas Moran, to protect Lifetime’s insurance policy portfolio pending a decision on the merits. Natlis seeks to intervene to recover money Moran seized while managing Lifetime’s…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kerr Ex Rel. Kerr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Yueh-Lan Wang Ex Rel. Wen-Young Wong v. New Mighty U.S. TrustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Malibu Media, LLC v. SteinerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- A Guy Named Moe, LLC v. Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Al-Menhali v. Marriott International Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.