Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Bergy

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 29, 1979No. Appeal Nos. 76-712, 77-535Published

1DissentMiller, Judge

I do not share the majority’s conclusion that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584, 98 S.Ct. 2522, 57 L.Ed.2d 451, 198 USPQ 193 (1978), sheds no light on these cases. By concentrating on the literal statements of the Court, including the Court’s quotation from its opinion in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp., 406 U.S. 518, 531, 92 S.Ct. 1700, 32 L.Ed.2d 273, 173 USPQ 769, 774 (1972), the majority has missed the essential thrust of the Court’s opinion that, recognizing that Congress could not foresee all new developments in technology and that 35 U.S.C. § 101…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Muniz v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API