Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Ester C. Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 21, 2017No. 12-CV-0041 (PKC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Pamela K. Chen, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Patrick Hughes and Nafise Nina Hodjat (together, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Defendants The Ester C Company, NBTY, Inc., and Na-tureSmart LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that Defendants’ labeling of their “Ester-C” vitamin C supplements (the “Products”) as “The Better Vitamin C” is unlawful, deceptive, and misbranded. By Order dated September 30, 2016 (the “Order”), the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion to certify a nationwide class, as well as their motion to certify California and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Tonga Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Universities Superannuation Scheme Ltd. v. Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PetrobrasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jensen v. Cablevision Sys. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- In re ACTOS Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Murphy v. City of ElmiraDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024