Legal Opinion

In the Interest of C.C.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 27, 2001No. 86,119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, J.:

J.B. (hereafter referred to as “mother”) and R.C.. (hereafter referred to as “father”), the natural parents of C.C., C.B., and R.C., appeal the termination of their parental rights, claiming: (1) The evidence was insufficient to support the termination; and (2) the district court failed to properly consider and rule upon the parents’ motion for permanent guardianship. We affirm.

Father, mother, four children (including C.C., C.B., and R.C.), and J.C. (paternal grandmother) were all residing in a home owned by J.C. On August 3, 1999, police executed a search warrant at the home. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In The Interest of S.M.Q.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  3. In the Interest of J. G.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
  4. In the Interest of J.D.D.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  5. In re A.N.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In the Interest of M.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  2. In re D.T.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  3. In the Interest of C.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  4. In re D.G.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  5. In Re CBCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API