Legal Opinion
People v. Alexander
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 3, 2012PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
Before defendant Hans Alexander pleaded guilty, the trial judge observed to defense counsel that she would accept the plea “on the condition” that defendant withdraw any and all outstanding motions, which included a recently filed pro se *205constitutional speedy trial motion, and waive the right to appeal. During allocution, the judge twice asked defendant if he “under[stood]” that by entering into the guilty plea, all his “outstanding writs and motions” were “being withdrawn,” and he responded that he did. We conclude that the judge’s statements, considered in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. VallesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. TyrellNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. VencesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. KlingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. MonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.