Legal Opinion
Jankauskas v. Sandberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 30, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover dam*1091ages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated August 26, 2008, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A jury verdict should not be set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence unless the jury could not have reached the verdict by any fair interpretation of the evidence (see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744 [1995]; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rubin v. PecoraroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Lucian v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Koopersmith v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferreira v. Wyckoff Heights Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Coma v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Coma v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Wallace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Wallace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013