Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ledo Financial Corporation v. Harry L. Summers Daniel W. Dierdorff Sun Savings and Loan Association David Eichten, and Does 1 Through 50, Inclusive

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 20, 1997No. 94-56296Published

1DissentNoonan, Circuit Judge

This ease is an easy one if prior law is still good law. We have explicitly held that the D’Oench, Duhme doctrine bars suit based on oral statements not found in the bank files after the federal receiver has taken over the bank. Brookside Associates v. Rifkin, 49 F.3d 490, 495 (9th Cir.1995).

The court acknowledges that “it would be inclined to apply the D’Oench doctrine” but does not do so because two recent Supreme Court decisions have called this special federal common law doctrine into question. The question is heightened by the Supreme Court’s treatment of Motorcity of Jacksonville v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hess v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Brookside Associates v. RifkinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API