Legal Opinion
R. L. Renken v. Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1973No. 72-2564PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the defendant from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, confirming the arbitrator’s award for the plaintiffs, after the entry of a consent decree. Error is charged against the District Court’s Order confirming the award, made on June 14, 1972, in two respects: (a) respondent’s alleged error in failure to give adequate notice; and (b) an alleged fraud in presentation of an earlier claim by a respondent.
We find no merit in this appeal, and we find it a frivolous appeal. Rule 38, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
While the factual basis…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Leonard J. Furbee v. Vantage Press, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Grace Lowe v. Glenn A. WillacyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
3Cited by5 opinions
- William H. And Avilda L. Edwards v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lucy Ellen Candy Division of F & F Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Sandra S. Thompson v. Tega-Rand International, Albert Denola, Dba the Box Factory, and Runner's World Magazine Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States ex rel. Insurance Co. of North America v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Santa Fe Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978