Burke v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1DissentCologne, J.
I must respectfully dissent.
Under current law, plaintiffs cannot establish proximate cause which is necessary to create liability (see, generally, 4 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law (8th ed. 1974) Torts, § 488, p. 2749, § 622, p. 2904), even where it is claimed the presumption of negligence exists (Evid. Code, § 669, subd. (a), par. (2)).
It is the law of this state now that the consumption of alcoholic beverages rather than the furnishing of alcoholic beverages is “the proximate cause of injuries inflicted upon another by an intoxicated person” (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 25602, subd. (c); Civ. Code, §…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bernhard v. Harrah's ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.