Legal Opinion
O'Boyle v. Northwestern Fire & Marine Ins.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 11, 1931No. 345PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
With the evidence conflicting as above indicated, the denial of the defendant’s motion, made at the close of all the evidence, to dismiss the complaint for lack of proof, was not erroneous. Treated, as it should be, as a motion for a directed verdict, it presents the question of whether a jury of reasonable and impartial men were justified in finding the facts as the evidence in favor of the plaintiff tended to show them to be in spite of the evidence to the contrary. Troxell V» *716Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 227 U. S. 434, 33 S. Ct. 274, 57 L. Ed. 586. There…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- American Merchant Marine Ins. v. Liberty Sand & Gravel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
- Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Globe Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Globe & Rutgers Ins. Co. of New York v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Parrent v. Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Allen N. Spooner & Son, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. The Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- John Alt Furniture Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- Public Warehouses of Matanzas, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Messervey v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932