Legal Opinion
Martin Tabaku and Entela Bino v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 29, 2005No. 04-1689PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Martin Tabaku and Entela Bino, a married couple from Albania, claim that organized crime factions threatened both of their lives because of their efforts to free women from Albania’s sex-slave trade. The couple contend that their lives will be at risk if they are forced to return to Albania. They filed for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the United Nations Convention Against Torture. The Immigration Judge (IJ) denied all relief because he concluded that the couple’s story was not credible, a ruling the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Selemawit F. Giday v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Ahmed, Nuradin v. Gonzales, AlbertoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Juarez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- BinRashed v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Vissinto K. Ayi v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.