Legal Opinion

City of Haverhill v. DiBurro

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 11, 1958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

The city of Haverhill on May 25, 1956, brought a bill in equity to enjoin the defendant from using premises at 493 South Main Street in violation of the zoning ordinance. The case was referred to a master. On July 24, 1956, Augusto and Nina D’Alessandro (hereinafter called interveners) filed a motion that they be allowed to intervene. The attorneys for the city and the defendant, on September 10, 1956, as the master found, signed a form of final decree which recited that the bill of complaint “is hereby dismissed.” No action was taken by the court in respect of this draft decree. The master…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Check v. KaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Building Commissioner v. C. & H. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Dillaway v. BurtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Town of Needham v. Winslow Nurseries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  5. Hallett v. MooreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Woods v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Morganelli v. Building Inspector of CantonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. Town of Manchester v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  4. Cowen v. KRASASSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Smith v. Board of Appeals of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API