Gardner v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Harry B. Gardner and Harry M. Coudrey were convicted of offenses, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
Gardner and Coudrey were jointly indicted and convicted of 'a violation of section 5480, R. S. U. S., as amended by the act of March 2, 1889. They sued out separate writs of error to review the judgment of conviction, and the same have been *577consolidated for the purpose of hearing and decision. Taking up the case of Gardner, No. 4219, we find the following alleged errors properly assigned:(1) “The court erred in refusing to sustain the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence at the close of the whole case as to the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Lemon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Horn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Brooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Gould v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Chew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Mathews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Savage v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.