Union Telephone Co. v. Ingersoll

The controversy here involved may be fully understood from a perusal of the findings of fact and law filed by the learned circuit judge, who heard the case without a j ury. They follow:

*188“(1) That on or_about April 2, 1909, the parties made and entered into a contract in writing, dated April 2, 1909, by which the plaintiff agreed to install and maintain at the residence of defendant in the township of Greenbush, in said county of Clinton, one telephone for the period of five years upon a rental of $20 per year in quarterly payments, and subject to a rebate of 50 cents per quarter if paid at the…