Legal Opinion
Dugger v. Upledger Inst.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 31, 1992No. Civ. A. 90-0829PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
MENTZ, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of defendant Merrimack Mutual Fire Ins. Co. Finding the motion to be warranted, the Court grants the same.
I. Facts
Dr. David Leon Dugger has brought suit against the Upledger Institute and Dr. John E. Upledger 1 for negligent misrepresentation. He alleges the following facts. Sometime prior to January, 1988, Dr. Dug-ger received a brochure from the Institute, which brochure advertised a seminar on techniques of craniosacral therapy. Based upon the information contained in the brochure, Dr. Dugger…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. ChallonerSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Dugger v. Upledger InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993