Legal Opinion

Sullins v. State Ex Rel. Barnard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1912No. 3484PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Wade S. Stanfield, Judge. Mandamus by the State, on the relation of Kate Barnard, as Commissioner of Charities and Corrections, against J. W. Sullins and others, as the Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.

On December 13, 1911, the state of Oklahoma ex rel. Kate Barnard, as Commissioner of Charities and Corrections, filed in the district court of Okmulgee county a verified motion in the shape of a petition, wherein J. W. Sullins, Charley Myers, and Thomas Chism, as the board of county commissioners of Okmulgee county, plaintiffs in error, are made parties defendant. The allegations of the petition are made by her attorney, Dr. J. H. Stolper, who, after alleging himself so to be, and that Kate Barnard is the duly elected, qualified, and acting Commissioner of Charities and Corrections for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. CockrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Moore v. NationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. County Treasurer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Board of Com'rs of Seminole County v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Gypsy Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Buffington, Board of County Com'rs v. State BarnardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API