Legal Opinion
Pitts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 31, 2017No. Case No. 4:15-CV-1332 NABPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER1
NANNETTÉ A. BAKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This matter ■ is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant The Hertz Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (hereinafter referred to-as “Hertz”); [Doc. 29.] Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as “State Farm”)' filed a Memorandum in Opposition. [Doc. 37.] Based on the following, the Court will grant Hertz’s Motion for Summary Judgment.2
I. Standard for Summary Judgment
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c), a court may grant a motion for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric Cooperative, City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021