Legal Opinion

Watts v. Fleischman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1989No. CV-89-0049-PRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

We granted this petition for review to decide whether a nearly 7-month period during which a Tucson City Court judge held defendant’s pretrial motions under advisement is excludable time under rule 8.4, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. We hold that it is not.

Facts

Petitioner Judith A. Watts (defendant) was arrested on May 18, 1987, for driving under the influence of alcohol, in violation of A.R.S. § 28-692(A), and was arraigned on May 28, 1987. Trial in Tucson City Court was set for August 19, 1987. Defense counsel moved to suppress the intoxilyzer test result, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Hinson v. CoulterArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Stone v. WrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. VaskoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. State v. VaskoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API