Legal Opinion

Rose v. Merchants' Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by William R. Rose and another against the Merchants’ Trust Company. Judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.

Prior to 1901 there were in existence in Rutland, Vt., certain corporations, to wit, the Rutland Street Railway Company, the Chittenden Power Company, organized to acquire lands and build dams storage reservoirs, pipe lines, power stations, etc., for the manufacture and sale of electric power, and the People’s Gaslight Company, with the right to furnish light and power, both by gas and electricity. An improvement of these properties had been attempted and engineered by one Burgett, who had organized the Vermont Electric Securities Company. Upon the securities of these companies, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baird v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Schiffer v. . DietzNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Town of Mentz v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Mack v. . LattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Getty v. . DevlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API