Legal Opinion

Pope v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 12, 1995No. S94G1876, S94G1877PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunt, Chief Justice.

The defendants filed a speedy trial demand. After an unrelated appeal, the clerk’s office filed the remittitur from the Court of Appeals near the end of a court term when no juries were impaneled and qualified to serve. When the state failed to try the defendants during that court term or the next term, they moved for an acquittal, which the trial court denied. The Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted the writ of certiorari to consider whether a term of court counts under a speedy trial demand when no jury is available after the filing of the remittitur. We conclude that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Waller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Henry v. JamesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  4. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  3. Union v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. MacInnis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API