Legal Opinion
State v. Corr
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 1, 2005No. AC 24551PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The acquittee,1 Douglas Corr, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his application for discharge from the jurisdiction of the psychiatric security review board (board).2 On appeal, the acquittee claims that the court improperly (1) dismissed his application for discharge and (2) imposed on him the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that there was a mechanism in place to provide for continued medication and supervision. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michael G. Levine v. Patricia Torvik, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- State v. PutnokiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. MarchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. JacobConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MaskiellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. PetersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. WarrenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. CorrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. Foster (Concurrence)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.