Legal Opinion

Bleecker v. Drury

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 31, 1944No. Civ. No. 1501PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a motion to dismiss the action addressed to the Second Amended Complaint on the ground that the plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

No affidavits are submitted on the motion, and thus the scope of the court’s inquiry is restricted to the Second Amended Complaint, the only pleading now before the court. It sets forth three causes of action; the first, alleging a libel published in defendant’s brief filed with the Industrial Board of'New York, the second and third, realleging the first cause in toto and also adding separate causes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Youmans v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Moore v. Manufacturers' National Bank of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Kemper v. FortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. McLaughlin v. CowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bleecker v. DruryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Eye Encounter, Inc. v. Contour Art, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  3. Supreme Wine Co. v. Distributors of New England, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961
  4. Rosen Ex Rel. Egghead.Com, Inc. v. Brookhaven Capital Management, Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Day v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API