Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank New York Branch v. American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 16, 2011No. 09-4295Published

1ConcurrenceRendell, Circuit Judge

I join in Judge Sloviter’s fíne opinion and write separately only to note that while I was initially skeptical of Judge Sontchi’s view that a valuation based on discounted cash flow (DCF) was an appropriate “commercially reasonable determinant!] of value” of a repurchase agreement, I now wholeheartedly endorse this view. The factors that I believed, at first, warranted the conclusion that sale price was the only “commercially reasonable determinant! ] of value” of a repurchase agreement were twofold: first, the Bankruptcy Code treats repurchase agreements differently, permitting these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Victaulic Co. v. TiemanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Tabor Court Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Wellspan Health v. BaylissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. In Re American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API