State v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
Defendant argues that the trial court erred because the indictment charging him with felonious habitual impaired driving was insufficient. Specifically, defendant contends the indictment only alleged that he had two prior driving while impaired convictions rather than the requisite three. We disagree.
North Carolina General Statutes § 20-138.5(a) provides:
A person commits the offense of habitual impaired driving if he drives while impaired as defined in G.S. 20-138.1 and has been convicted of three or more offenses involving impaired driving as defined in G.S. 20-4.01(24a)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. McBaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. PriddyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. WaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Gayton-BarbosaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. LoboheCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.