Legal Opinion

State v. Priddy

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 1994No. 933SC744PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The primary issue which we must decide is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the charge of felonious habitual impaired driving for lack of jurisdiction. The State contends that the superior court had original jurisdiction to try the underlying issue of driving while impaired as an element of felonious habitual impaired driving because habitual impaired driving constitutes a substantive felony offense. Defendant argues that the habitual impaired driving does not constitute a separate felony offense; rather, it is a mere punishment enhancement statute like G.S. § 14-7.1,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. VardimanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API