Legal Opinion
Lasch v. Antkies
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1958No. 22567PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
The original complaint in this action sought rescission of a sale of stock made by defendants, citizens of New York, to plaintiff, a citizen of Pennsylvania, pursuant to a written agreement. The jurisdiction and venue on the original complaint are claimed solely under the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 771 and 77v. The complaint was served on the defendants in New York under the terms of the above statute, which permits service of process wherever the defendant may be found. 15 U.S.C.A. § 77v.
Subsequently, plaintiff filed an amended complaint to include an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Pearce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Moreno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
- Thompson v. Trent Maritime CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Johnson v. ScarboroughDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1949
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hans Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, G. M. B. HCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Cooper v. North Jersey Trust Company of Ridgewood, NJDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Kane v. Central American Mining & Oil, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Robinson v. Penn Central Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Shields & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.