Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Safe Deposit Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 2, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

By this motion Marian M. Cassidy, formerly Marian M. Phillips, claiming an interest in the subject-matter of this litigation (a gold dinner service) asks permission to assert her rights thereto by intervention (Equity Rule 37, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723).

In her proposed answer (bill of intervention) she alleges: “4. That the gold dinner service mentioned and referred to in the complaint in this action and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached to said complaint is the sole and separate property of said Marian M. Cassidy and that neither the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wylie v. CoxeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Minot v. MastinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Donovan v. CampionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  5. Rhinehart v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API