Legal Opinion

Schonberg v. New York Life Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 27, 1958No. 42183PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATE, Justice ad hoc.

Plaintiffs are the widow and children of Clarence E. Schonberg, to whom prior to his death defendant had issued two life insurance contracts. Plaintiffs, as beneficiaries under the policies, appeal from dismissal of their suit to recover double indemnity benefits thereunder in the total amount of $5,000 (defendant insurer having voluntarily paid the principal benefits).

The applicable policy provision pertinently- states:

“The Double Indemnity provided on the first page hereof shall be payable upon receipt of due proof that the death of the Insured resulted directly and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Brown v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. DodgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  4. Seguin v. Continental Service Life & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  5. Neider v. Continental Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. HeywardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sherwood v. SteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Loeblich v. GarnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. INA Life Insurance Company v. BrundinAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API