Legal Opinion
Lennon v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 16, 2006No. 05-73450PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Nancy M. Lennon (“Plaintiff”) filed this lawsuit against the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met Life”), pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, seeking personal accident insurance (“PAI”) benefits allegedly due to her as a beneficiary under her deceased son’s insurance policy.
On October 20, 2003, Met Life determined that Plaintiff was not entitled to PAI benefits, and denied Plaintiffs appeal of this decision on May 26, 2004. Plaintiff thereafter filed this lawsuit on September 7, 2005. In her…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Daniel v. Eaton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Alane King, as Conservator and Natural Parent of Amber Lynn Schanus v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stamp v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
- McGillivray v. Life Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007